May 8, 2011 by

What Does Mission Really Look Like? (part 2)

2 comments

Categories: church, missional, Tags: , , ,

First of all…Happy Mothers Day to all the mothers. ūüôā

In my previous post, I began rambling about my re-thinking of what mission is, and what it really can look like in the Biblical sense. I talked about how I think we need to get back to the basics with this idea, stripping off the ulterior motives and getting back to something closer to what Jesus modeled for us. (If you need more detail, read the last post to get caught up.)

When you consider that Jesus’ mission was not to build an organization, or establish a new religion, but simply to redeem–it opens up a whole range of ideas (at least for me) of what mission can look like. ¬†There are a lot of good things we can do that are redemptive in scope that have little or nothing to do with putting warm bodies in our pews.

This idea really appeals to me because I’ve become really turned off with the agendas we attach to our evangelism efforts. ¬†It is truly distasteful to me when I see pastors, ministers and even some zealous church members doing “good” things in the community, and knowing that their primary motive for doing so is ultimately to get more people to come into their Sunday services. It may or may not be overtly stated, but you can feel it. ¬†Non-believers can tell when they have been targeted. ¬†It isn’t that it’s “bad” for new people to come to Sunday services–it’s just that we have too much personally riding on that result. ¬†The way we have our institutions set up, we have too much to gain by it, and frankly, it makes it difficult for many ministers to keep pure motives.

But what if that weren’t a factor? ¬†What if we could get back to the idea of doing things that are redemptive and Christlike, regardless of what personal satisfaction or benefit we could gain from doing them?

I am really pondering this idea of what I’ll call “agenda-free mission.” ¬†Of course, any mission has a goal, or a desired outcome, but by “agenda” I mean ulterior motive. ¬†I’m coming from the perspective that as Jesus said, “God sends rain on the just and the unjust.” ¬†In other words, everyone is a candidate for the love and mercy of God, regardless of whether they accept it or believe in Him. ¬†When I talk about doing things that are redemptive, I am talking about doing lifegiving things in our communities without worrying about how many converts or churchgoers come from it–doing redemptive things because they are redemptive, and for no other reason. ¬†Acts of kindness, acts of mercy, acts of giving, just because they are the things Jesus would be doing if He were here in the flesh. ¬†No strings attached.

So what does that mean? What can mission look like when no strings are attached?

It could be as simple as giving to the poor without preaching to them.

It could be as simple as encouraging people who are discouraged, or helping people reach their personal goals.

It could be as simple as being present with someone in a time of crisis.

For me and my family–our heart is particularly drawn to looking for ways to build up and enable the creative/artistic community–to find creative and constructive ways to encourage and enable artists, musicians and the like to thrive, flourish and pursue their dreams. This goes for believers and non-believers alike.

Redemption can take many forms, as long as the “agenda” is simply love without condition, the way Jesus loves us all.

Does that mean the good news should not be proclaimed? No, of course the good news should be told. But first of all, with the exception of a few people groups in third-world nations, most people in our culture have now already heard a version of the gospel at least once. The issue isn’t that people haven’t heard; it’s that we have been doing a lot more¬†talking than we have been¬†doing–and there is a difference between living the truth of the gospel and simply employing tactics to gather an unsuspecting audience so we can preach to them. ¬†The goal shouldn’t be to sell the message, but to¬†live it in such a manner that the message of God’s love for mankind¬†sells itself.

So what about getting people “saved?” What about getting people to come to Christ on a personal level? ¬†Isn’t that critical to mission?

Yes, it is. But we have made a critical error, I believe, in our approach to it. ¬†It starts with a simple question: “Who is the Savior of the world?”

Obvious answer: Jesus is.

If Jesus is the Savior…then I am not. ¬†Period. ¬†I might be able in my own strength to sweet-talk someone into praying a prayer with me, but that doesn’t mean I’ve won them to Christ. The truth is, I am completely incapable of converting anyone. ¬†Only God can draw people to Himself. ¬†The best any of us can hope for is to help out, and hopefully not get in His way.

Our problem is, as the church, we have inadvertently placed ourselves in the position of savior. ¬†We have taken the responsibility of conversion completely on our shoulders, and assumed our job was to talk people into it at all costs. ¬†Jesus made Himself the bridge to the Father, the mediator between God and man; but somehow we’ve fancied ourselves the keeper of the gate, and as a result, we’ve inserted ourself into that redemption pathway, sometimes even getting in the way between man and God without even realizing. ¬†As a result, so many of the “good” things we do in this world get tinged with this self-imposed mandate to get people to make a commitment, when only God really knows when each person is ready to do that.

As I’ve pondered the mission of Christ, I’ve really come to see that this is His mission, and anything I do is simply part of something I didn’t initiate. Jesus is with any person I encounter before I get there, and He will be with that person after I leave. I am only playing a part in an ongoing redemptive mission, and the end result is up to Jesus. Meanwhile, to whatever extent I can make that person’s life better while I am in contact with them, to whatever extent I can show love to that person without condition–I think that is a vital part of mission.

So thinking more about this…how can each of us make that transition into agenda-free mission? ¬†I’ll have some thoughts about that in the next post.

 

Musician. Composer. Recovering perfectionist. Minister-in-transition. Lover of puns. Hijacker of rock song references. Questioner of the status quo. I'm not really a rebel. Just a sincere Christ-follower with a thirst for significance that gets me into trouble. My quest has taken me over the fence of institutional Christianity. Here are some of my random thoughts along the way. Read along, join in the conversation. Just be nice.

2 Responses to What Does Mission Really Look Like? (part 2)

  1. Heartspeak

    I find it fascinating and reassuring that our thoughts along these lines can be so similar. Fascinating because we are thinking similarly and in the same context. Reassuring because, to me, it’s evidence of the Spirit of God at work everywhere, moving people in the direction He desires.

    However, along the way, as I purge my old measurement system, I find that I struggle with the reality that there are folks who do not follow Jesus who are doing things that appear to be the same as me. What then, are their motivations? How am I any different because of my faith if I look and act like them? (admittedly, this is a much smaller subsection of the world than would be preferable) Nonetheless, if I arrive at this mission of redemption because of my faith and they arrive at what appears to be the same mission on the surface, without faith…. what’s going on?

    The other interesting concept is that those who actually receive the ‘well done’ from the Master don’t even know that they did anything special! (Matt 25:37) So if I believe that the ‘simple’ acts of redemption are done in His name, I guess I won’t be one of those asking that question….

    • Wayward Son Post author

      Heartspeak, sorry it took so long to respond.

      You ask a very thoughtful question here, and two thoughts come to mind. One thought I actually expressed in part three of this series even before I re-visited your comment here: I think that while we all have our crap to deal with, most people at least want to do the right thing (even if they don’t). So perhaps people without faith who are doing redemptive things are simply demonstrating what it is like to do good without the baggage attached–they are doing what they perceive to be right, just because it is right.

      The other thing that comes to mind is a Scripture in Luke 9, where the disciples tried to prevent someone from casting out demons in the name of Jesus, because he wasn’t part of their group–and Jesus said, “Do not hinder him; for he who is not against you is for you.” It’s not quite the same scenario, but I think it’s the same principle. I have a belief that God can accomplish His redemptive purposes through anyone or anything (see Numbers 22). So when someone who is not of our faith is doing things Jesus would do, I think it’s okay to acknowledge, and even celebrate, that Jesus might be working through that person without the person even realizing it. Just like sometimes He works through you and me without our actually intentionally doing something good. ūüôā

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.