Kathy over at the carnival in my head has been doing a great series of posts called “what could be.” One of her recent entries was about “equality practiced,” in which she shares about how the church should intentionally practice equality with one another with regard to gender, race, socio-economic standing…in all things.
I’ve been mulling over this one for days, and finally decided to post my thoughts here rather than in her comments. And this post is in two parts so as not to overwhelm the reader. 🙂
First, let me say I respect Kathy greatly and appreciate what she brings to the table; so my thoughts here are not to refute what she has said, but to enhance it, to add my two-cents to the online conversation. But as I’ve pondered this, I think that if we’re going to be true to Scripture, we’re going to have to move beyond equality (I’ll unpack that momentarily)–because there are some things about our ideas of equality that could actually lead us off course. I’m going to get a bit nuanced here, so forgive me if you start feeling like I’m splitting hairs. But I think this is important because if you are charting a course in navigation, even being a fraction of a degree off course will eventually land you in the wrong place. It’s important that we get this right, and that’s why I’m going to split hairs a little bit.
Let me begin with a rather provocative statement:
I don’t see that the Scripture specifically teaches the equality of individuals as a principle or a virtue to be practiced.
(Put down the rocks. Lemme splain.)
In our culture, even though it isn’t always practiced, we see equality as an inherent principle for mankind: “All men are created equal.” It is so ingrained in us that we almost forget that this statement is found in the Declaration of Independence, not the Scripture. In fact, the closest I see the Bible coming to matching the idea of equality is in its mandate not to practice favoritism in the church. (See James 2 for an example.)
One might say, “But aren’t these one and the same?” Not quite. As we will hopefully see…equality and favoritism are pendulum swings to opposite extremes, and both run the risk of causing oppression to somebody. And let me say right now that favoritism has caused a lot of the social ills we face, and it is wrong. When I suggest that “equality” is not specifically taught in the Bible, I am NOT saying that discrimination is okay. Racial oppression, the oppression of women (especially in the church)…these and other examples are very real, and very wrong. What I’m suggesting is that equality in itself is not enough to cure these ills.
That said…I think there’s an important reason why we don’t see equality specifically mentioned in Scripture, and it has to do with how the writers of Scripture saw the world, as opposed to our own Western cultural worldview.
You see, “equality” is actually a mathematical term–a comparative measurement of value. We are a very mathematical culture; we carry this intrinsic belief that everything can be explained or defined in mathematical/scientific terms. So in our minds, we are always measuring everything, weighing everything, comparing everything with everything else. When we say two things are equal, it means we are comparing them and determining that they have the same value.
But here’s the rub: how do you assess a specific value to things like a human life, a human soul, or human gender, talent or ability? How do you measure things like love? And even more importantly…who can compare the worth of one life with another? It’s a subtle thing that almost all of us fall into, but when we view these things in the light of equality, we begin to assess our own worth and the worth of others by…comparison. And I think this is something the Scripture does not teach. In fact, the writers of Scripture did not even try to measure these intangibles, because they didn’t see the world this way. Yes, things like prejudice existed even in Bible days, but the idea of translating the worth of people to a mathematical term like equality would not have been how they would have described it.
Now, having said that…let’s look at what the Bible does say about how we should treat one another:
“Do nothing from selfishness or empty conceit, but with humility of mind regard one another as more important than yourselves.” (Phil. 2:3, emphasis mine)
“Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil; cling to what is good. Be devoted to one another in brotherly love; give preference to one another in honor.” (Rom. 12:9-10)
If I’m reading these correctly, in the light of other Scriptures, the Bible actually raises the bar as far as “equality” goes. We are not taught to see one another as equals; we are urged to voluntarily humble ourselves and regard others as more important–which is precisely what Jesus did when He came to earth as a man. This is what I mean by moving past equality. In truth, I see that the heart of God in Scripture–especially as relating to the church–is that we are not to be comparing ourselves with one another to be sure that we are equal, but rather we should be embracing and celebrating each unique life and gift for what it is, without comparison.
(Stay tuned…)
Jeff,
I agree!! That is the teaching of the Bible, not to compare, but to consider others more honorable than yourself.
That’s really the only way that the works of the flesh can be taken out of the picture, (i.e. – jealousy, envy, selfish ambition)
As a result, gender/race/economic bias and negative feelings toward those who are more gifted or perceived to be more gifted are taken out of the way. Good post.
Gary
Jeff,
This is excellent! My heart really resonates with everything here. I’m so glad you are doing two posts on this subject…for I believe the definition of “equality” has been grossly misinterpreted, misused and not seen correctly. I really agree with you that we are meant to confidently humble ourselves and look at others as more important than we are. By doing so, this IS Love. Indeed, Jesus did this! This enables true compassion, grace and thoughtfulness of others. Doing so is not to destructively put ourselves “down,” but by having our identity and “okayness” in Father’s Love, we can humble ourselves and see through Papa’s lens of Love in seeing how others are to be lifted up by and through us. In doing so, we acknowledge that Father will take care of our needs, and in essence, by loving others, we are, in effect, inadvertantly taking care of our own needs because when someone gives spiritually, they receive all they need. Thus, this frees up from “worrying” about how we are going to “get” our own needs met, because we rest in the confidence, trust and faith that Papa will provide all that.
I am looking forward to your second post.
Blessings,
~Amy 🙂
http://amyiswalkinginthespirit.blogspot.com
Jeff, I’d never heard it put that way before, but the more I think about it, the more I agree with you. If we would see others as more important, the equality question would be moot.
love it! yeah, that’s the idea. great deep important challenging thoughts in all kinds of ways..thanks, jeff!
Gary,
Since it seems sin is so self-centered anyhow, it makes sense that those sinful impulses are neutralized when we stop drawing comparisons and just celebrate one another.
Amy,
Thanks for making the point about not destructively putting ourselves down in the process of humbling ourselves. The term I use for this is “false humility” or “martyrdom”, and it *is* a destructive counterfeit to the true preferring of others.
Co-heir,
This is really the first time I’ve put my mind around this, as well. Kathy really knows how to make one think… 🙂
Kathy,
See comment above. 🙂
This is really excellent Jeff! I recently heard that the definition of pride is thinking that you are better than someone else.. seems to jive with what you said towards the end of your post.
I too am in agreement Jeff. I have long believed that when the Spirit of God mingles with our spirit it produces a unique expression of the Person of Christ that can only be revealed through each of us individually.
No two humans express the same aspect of Christ, making it impossible to compare ourselves with one another.
Oh that we would learn how to complement one another rather than compete with on another.
Looking forward to the follow-up!