Cred where cred is due…Co-heir sparked my thoughts with what he wrote here…and this post below is what came out. 🙂
I’ve mentioned numerous times here that my rather broad church background (from liturgical to evangelical to charismatic) includes my family’s involvement in the Word of Faith movement–which for some is associated not so much with the concept of faith it teaches as the “prosperity gospel” it promotes. This particular message receives a great deal of flack, and is caricatured as a grouping of well-dressed preachers who support their extravagant lifestyles by talking people into giving their money to them–citing Scripture to say that God will return their donations 100-fold.
My purpose here isn’t to defend the excesses so many of us have seen; they are bad, and they are coming to light. (A major scandal in my own town about this kind of thing has resulted in major reform at a local Christian university in the past couple of years.) The only thing I would say is that our criticisms of any doctrine or camp need to be fair and as accurate as possible. When I hear someone blasting the prosperity doctrine because of the excesses of people who preach it, rather than talking about whether the doctrine itself is correct and why…it loses credibility for me. That’s like saying the entire gospel is bogus because you know a Christian who is a hypocrite; it’s the same screwy logic, just aimed at a particular part of the gospel.
(In fairness to Co-heir, I’m not offended by what he wrote, because he did include some substance in his post in talking about this, and I agree with his conclusions. I just know a lot of people who rail against things without substantial reason, and I don’t find that helpful in ascertaining the truth.)
Behind the scandals and injustices that do exist, there is the underlying question that the prosperity message addresses: Does God want us to prosper? And if we consider this, it raises other questions, like: What is prosperity? How do we know if we are prospering? Is it all about money or things?
Truth be told, I find overdrawn conclusions on both sides of this issue, and both sides “proof-text” and stretch the Scripture to back their own belief. I’ve heard prosperity preachers tell their congregations that God wants all of them to be millionaires, and I find that to be a huge stretch. On the other hand, I don’t see any substantial proof in the Bible that God wants us all to be poor, either. Some of the greatest men of faith in the Bible were also some of the wealthiest; Abraham was among the richest men of his time. So was Job–twice. 😉 So while I don’t think God’s primary aim is to make us all rich by men’s standards, neither do I believe lack is something that gives Him glory.
All that said…Jesus said we would know a tree by its fruit, and granted, that’s a huge part of unraveling this issue. The excesses of the prosperity preachers is definitely fruit; but it’s actually a small part of the fruit. In my view, there is a wider, more damaging result to the way this message has been presented, if not the message itself. My greatest criticism of the Word of Faith movement and the prosperity message is that they have produced a generation of self-centered, materialistic Christians. We’ve focused so much on how God wants us to prosper, how God wants us to have our material needs met, that our faith has become all about us.
In fairness…I’ve personally heard some of these preachers address this issue and try to say that prosperity isn’t all about us and our needs, but about being a blessing to the world. But honestly, I haven’t seen that take root. Instead, the same preachers who say these things will stir up their people at offering time with promises of breakthrough and wealth, appealing to the basest instincts of our greed. Our offering becomes our investment, not in the gospel, but in ourselves.
This is not the way I see the New Testament church described. Yes, I see the part about how there was “no lack among them” in Jerusalem, and the Scripture where John said, “I desire above all things that you prosper and be in health, even as your soul prospers.” But I also see in the hearts of the early believers such a passion for Jesus and for the world to benefit from His coming, that they were willing to lay down their very lives and give little or no thought to their own comforts. They lived unto a higher Kingdom, and sought that Kingdom first, as Jesus taught us to do. I submit that they were prospering, but prosperity took a much different form than everyone just sitting around concerned about their personal needs. Their priorities were much different than ours, and the things they cared about, that made them happy on the inside, were of a much different caliber.
Ours has become a very selfish Christianity. We might say we care for the world and have compassion for the “lost”, but for so many of us, our focus is still on what we need, what we want–and not just concerning material things. We come to our church meetings with anticipation of our weekly spiritual “jump-start”, how God will meet us and bless us, what we can get out of the service. For many of us, even if we share our faith with others, the underlying agenda is that we come away feeling good about what a good Christian we are–not a genuine, selfless compassion for the person we’re sharing with. So much of what we do is still all about us; we’ve become terribly self-addicted as a people.
Yeah, I know it hurts. I’m pointing the other four fingers right back at me. Get over it. It’s the truth, and we know it.
This, to me is the fruit. The prosperity message hasn’t been the sole reason for our selfish Christianity, but I think it’s pretty obvious that it has fed into our selfishness, and justified it, made it stronger. This tells me that either this teaching must be outright error at worst, or unbalanced at best, not taking into account the whole counsel of Scripture.
If you ask me to choose between the two options…I believe it is unbalanced. I think it is just as much unbalanced to say God wants you wealthy as to say God wants you poor or doesn’t care whether you pay your bills. The whole reason we have that argument going on is that we have missed the point. Certainly I believe God wants to address our physical and material needs. (What loving parent wouldn’t?) It’s just not all there is to it. The prosperity/poverty debate itself distracts us, and turns our focus away from the weightier matters. Christ is on a mission; He’s invited us to be a part of it. The adventure is not without risk, but carries great reward. The material things, if anything, should be a means to a greater end.
So…does God want us to prosper? I believe He does, and I think Scripture confirms that. I just think our selfish Christianity has clouded the issue of what true prosperity is and what it looks like. I think this isn’t about deciding whether God wants us to be rich or to be poor. I think it’s when we lay aside our selfish Christianity and truly run after Christ that we will re-learn the truth about the abundant life Jesus said He came to give us.
I agree.
I think we're all just sooo defined by our cultures and not Him and His Word. The definitions we use are wrong. I believe God desires us to 'prosper' – to live life to the fullest/most abundant — but when we say that — we automatically in our self-focused and culture brain washed selves think of things, stuff, money……
but really I believe prosperity is having what's necessary to do God's will in your life and live as He desires.
check out
I don't believe we should desire excess or poverty — but should just desire God to take care of us enough that we don't even have to think about it. Not part of the equation or our worry.
check out proverbs 30:7-9
thanks for ur words
I have my issues with WoF. I know people (many) who ended up deeply in debt because they felt so strongly compelled to "prove" how God was favoring them. But yes, you're right, it's pointless to argue this as a reason why WoF is wrong, instead we have to address the doctrine.
I am not qualified to argue it, except to say it's interesting to me that so many of the words translated as "prosper" in the bible also mean "wisdom" and "peace". Puts a new spin on it.
Randi Jo,
I like your description of prosperity, and thanks for your input here. 🙂
Erin,
In a huge sense, I've been one of those "victims", and have my own story of loss while trying to bail myself out by giving in days past. To me, it isn't necessarily proof of bad doctrine in itself, but it is definitely proof of bad application. When we are self-centered and materialistic, we see so one-dimensionally, and try to make Biblical principles work the way we want them to, rather than how God desires.
Another definition for prosper is just simply "do well" or "succeed". For me…the times I have prospered most in life are the times when I cared least about how much money I had, or did not have. Believe me, that lesson was hard-learned. 🙂 Thanks for the input.
Thanks for the cred. 🙂 I agree completely with what you wrote. Christianity has become an all about me religion, whether it's prosperity preachers, evangelicals, or fundamentalists. I'm sure there are Word of Faith preachers with a balanced view of prosperity. There's even one or two good fundy preachers 🙂 We definitely have to get back to the point of view of the early followers of Jesus.
"I just think our selfish Christianity has clouded the issue of what true prosperity is and what it looks like."
Jeff, I think you hit the nail on the head with this statement. I believe we have defined prosperity to equate to material possessions or wealth. I don't see that same definition in Scripture.
Co-heir,
You're welcome for the cred. Thanks for the inspiration. 🙂
Jeff,
Part of how we mis-define prosperity, I think, occurs the same way we have misinterpreted so many other concepts of Scripture: we interpret it in light of our own culture rather than when it was written. We have defaulted to measuring prosperity/success by how our materialistic culture measures it, and the true and deeper meaning gets lost. In all fairness…most WoF preachers I have heard qualify that prosperity means more than material wealth, but my experience is that the vast majority of the time, people (including those preachers) are still referring to wealth whenever they use the word.
Since returning to Christianity, and reading many unique blogs on the subject, I am amused and baffled by the lingo that I obviously don't know. I've never heard of all of the different "movements" or "messages" that I keep hearing about through these blogs and Christian friends. When did all of this come about? Why is there a need for all of these "movements"? What ever happened with just being a Christian and following the text in the bible as best as you understand it?
I know I'm probably being naive, but I just don't see the relevancy of these things. Is it just a new term for denominations without taking on the stereotypes of the denominations? Is this a new way to be considered "non-denominational" while still presenting your own slant on Christianity?
Reina,
In short, you have it pegged. We really shouldn't be identified by a movement or a message, but by the simple following of Jesus. And you're also right that when we segregate into camps according to various movements and messages, it's not much different than denominations. I make reference to different camps from time to time (especially when sharing my own story) because there is some measure of truth to be gained from most of them. At the same time, while I try to be aware that there are people from different backgrounds on this blog who may not have a frame of reference for certain terms…I also need to be reminded of that. Thanks.
I believe you have inspired another blog post. Look for it next week sometime…